Friday, February 29, 2008

History Of Men's Fashion - The 1940's

This is part three of what will be a ten part article on The History Of Men's Fashion. I will be covering one decade in each article. If you are interested in reading part one, The 1920's click here.



The 1940's, the decade of World War 2, Casablanca, Albert Einstein and the invigoration of the Hawaiian shirt.


1941 Chrysler in San Francisco

Here are some quick facts about America at the beginning of this decade.

1 out of 5 Americans owned a car.
1 out of 7 had a telephone.
15% of college age Americans actually attended
(below: early 40's businessmen in Philadelphia)


The beginning of the decade saw extreme social and economic conditions. Other statistics revealed that only 75% of American households had a refrigerator or ice box, 60% lacked central heat and three out of four farmhouses were lit with kerosene lamps. Remember, America was slowly getting back on it's feet after Great Depression era. The hardships of the thirties, a time when many Americans' escapism flourished through Hollywood movies.




It is impossible to discuss fashion in the 1940's without first understanding the impact of World War II, always keep in mind, social trends dictate fashion.

- September 3, 1939: England and France declare war on Germany for invading Poland
- September 3, 1940: The United States transferred destroyers to Great Britain.
- December 8, 1941: USA enters the war.
- March 8, 1942: The US Government War Production Board issued regulation L - 85, which regulated every aspect of clothing and restricted the use of natural fibers.

Wool supplies were cut, forcing the increased production of inferior artificial fibers like viscose and rayon, which tends to shrink and isn't very warm.
(chart below: wartime fashion regulations)
To minimize the amount of fabric, men’s suits were made without vests and pocket flaps, trousers lost their multiple pleats and cuffs.
Zoot suits, which first made their presence in the 1930's, were scorned because of their use of excessive fabric. This attitude, fueled by racial prejudice and tensions between American servicemen stationed in southern California and Los Angeles' Chicano community led to the Zoot Suit Riots in 1943.
Still, the Zoot suit endured, and even flourished after the war when troops came back home. Excessive fabric was now seen perceived as luxurious, so that meant long coats were back as well. (Betty Grable)

The War came to an end.
Post-war fashions also included the birth of the casual shirt. Hawaiian shirts (which were created a decade earlier as "Aloha shirts") began to appear in California and Florida. Hand-painted ties featuring skyscrapers, exotic foliage and even pin-up girls became a common sight.

Before the war, New York fashion designers would attend the shows in France for inspiration. But once France was occupied by the Germans the designers concentrated on making new fashions for sportswear, which led to U.S. becoming the sportswear capitol of the world.
(above: vintage 40's Aloha shirt)



The first bikini, 1946









In 1949 Esquire promoted the "bold look", loose fitting jackets with pronounced shoulders.
Also notched lapels were now associated with single-breasted suits and peak lapels with double-breasteds.
(right: the bold-look demonstrated)


The long dominance of London's custom tailors began to break down after World War II. The bold look in men’s clothing signaled Italian and American fashion independence from Britain, where designers still adhered to fairly conservative styles.

Carol Nolan (fashion historian) writes on the 1940's:
The end of the decade saw American men home from the war and craving a new look, tired of uniforms. American designers left their mark on the world with sportswear. Europe now looked to the United States for trends in sportswear. For the first time in history, young people were setting fashion trends and older people were following.
(above: A NYC family in 1947)Lauren Bacall

click here for History of Men's Fashion - The 1930's



6 comments:

The Fitness Diva said...

Very nice article, and I love the pics! Keep it coming!

Anonymous said...

Don’t believe one optimistic word from any public figure about the economy or humanity in general. They are all part of the problem. Its like a game of Monopoly. In America, the richest 1% now hold 1/2 OF ALL UNITED STATES WEALTH. Unlike ‘lesser’ estimates, this includes all stocks, bonds, cash, and material assets held by America’s richest 1%. Even that filthy pig Oprah acknowledged that it was at about 50% in 2006. Naturally, she put her own ‘humanitarian’ spin on it. Calling attention to her own ‘good will’. WHAT A DISGUSTING HYPOCRITE SLOB. THE RICHEST 1% HAVE LITERALLY MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. Don’t fall for any of their ‘humanitarian’ CRAP. ITS A SHAM. THESE PEOPLE ARE CAUSING THE SAME PROBLEMS THEY PRETEND TO CARE ABOUT. Ask any professor of economics. Money does not grow on trees. The government can’t just print up more on a whim. At any given time, there is a relative limit to the wealth within ANY economy of ANY size. So when too much wealth accumulates at the top, the middle class slip further into debt and the lower class further into poverty. A similar rule applies worldwide. The world’s richest 1% now own over 40% of ALL WORLD WEALTH. This is EVEN AFTER you account for all of this ‘good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS from celebrities and executives. ITS A SHAM. As they get richer and richer, less wealth is left circulating beneath them. This is the single greatest underlying cause for the current US recession. The middle class can no longer afford to sustain their share of the economy. Their wealth has been gradually transfered to the richest 1%. One way or another, we suffer because of their incredible greed. We are talking about TRILLIONS of dollars. Transfered FROM US TO THEM. Over a period of about 27 years. Thats Reaganomics for you. The wealth does not ‘trickle down’ as we were told it would. It just accumulates at the top. Shrinking the middle class and expanding the lower class. Causing a domino effect of socio-economic problems. But the rich will never stop. They will never settle for a reasonable share of ANYTHING. They will do whatever it takes to get even richer. Leaving even less of the pie for the other 99% of us to share. At the same time, they throw back a few tax deductable crumbs and call themselves ‘humanitarians’. Cashing in on the PR and getting even richer the following year. IT CAN’T WORK THIS WAY. Their bogus efforts to make the world a better place can not possibly succeed. Any 'humanitarian' progress made in one area will be lost in another. EVERY SINGLE TIME. IT ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT WORK THIS WAY. This is going to end just like a game of Monopoly. The current US recession will drag on for years and lead into the worst US depression of all time. The richest 1% will live like royalty while the rest of us fight over jobs, food, and gasoline. Crime, poverty, and suicide will skyrocket. So don’t fall for all of this PR CRAP from Hollywood, Pro Sports, and Wall Street PIGS. ITS A SHAM. Remember: They are filthy rich EVEN AFTER their tax deductable contributions. Greedy pigs. Now, we are headed for the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time. SEND A “THANK YOU” NOTE TO YOUR FAVORITE MILLIONAIRE. ITS THEIR FAULT. I’m not discounting other factors like China, sub-prime, or gas prices. But all of those factors combined still pale in comparison to that HUGE transfer of wealth to the rich. Anyway, those other factors are all related and further aggrivated because of GREED. If it weren’t for the OBSCENE distribution of wealth within our country, there never would have been such a market for sub-prime to begin with. Which by the way, was another trick whipped up by greedy bankers and executives. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. The credit industry has been ENDORSED by people like Oprah, Ellen, Dr Phil, and many other celebrities. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. Now, there are commercial ties between nearly every industry and every public figure. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for their ‘good will’ BS. ITS A LIE. If you fall for it, then you’re a fool. If you see any real difference between the moral character of a celebrity, politician, attorney, or executive, then you’re a fool. WAKE UP PEOPLE. ITS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. The 1% club will always say or do whatever it takes to get as rich as possible. Without the slightest regard for anything or anyone but themselves. Vioxx. Their idea. Sub-prime. Their idea. NAFTA. Their idea. Outsourcing. Their idea. The commercial lobbyist. Their idea. The multi-million dollar lawsuit. Their idea. $200 cell phone bills. Their idea. $200 basketball shoes. Their idea. $30 late fees. Their idea. $30 NSF fees. Their idea. $20 DVDs. Their idea. Subliminal advertising. Their idea. The MASSIVE campaign to turn every American into a brainwashed credit card, pharmaceutical, love-sick, celebrity junkie. Their idea. All of which concentrate the world’s wealth and resources and wreak havok on society. All of which have been CREATED AND ENDORSED by celebrities, athletes, and executives. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for their ‘ good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS. ITS A SHAM. NOTHING BUT TAX DEDUCTABLE PR CRAP. Bottom line: The richest 1% will soon tank the largest economy in the world. It will be like nothing we’ve ever seen before. and thats just the beginning. Greed will eventually tank every major economy in the world. Causing millions to suffer and die. Oprah, Angelina, Brad, Bono, and Bill are not part of the solution. They are part of the problem. EXTREME WEALTH HAS MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. WITHOUT WORLD PROSPERITY, THERE WILL NEVER BE WORLD PEACE OR ANYTHING EVEN CLOSE. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL. Of course, the rich will throw a fit and call me a madman. Of course, their ignorant fans will do the same. You have to expect that. But I speak the truth. If you don’t believe me, then copy this entry and run it by any professor of economics or socio-economics. Then tell a friend. Call the local radio station. Re-post this entry or put it in your own words. Be one of the first to predict the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time and explain its cause. WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE.

Emma said...

I just wanted to point out that your 1940's blonde bombshell was not Lauren Bacall, but in fact, Veronica Lake.

Otherwise, a very interesting article.

<b>Ugly Naked Guy</b> said...

I didn't get a chance to read all of this yet (I'm at work), but a quick perusal did not show me anything about tuxes. I need to know what the style of them were. Do you have any info or resources for me? Thanks in advance.

kenny said...

Lauren Bacall looks like Veronica Lake or Kim Basinger in L.A.Confidental.

ed said...

借錢,黃金,黃金回收,黃金價格,黃金買賣,當舖

A片,A片,成人網站,成人影片,色情,情色網,情色,AV,AV女優,成人影城,成人,色情A片,日本AV,免費成人影片,成人影片,SEX,免費A片,A片下載,免費A片下載,做愛,情色A片,色情影片,H漫,A漫,18成人

a片,色情影片,情色電影,a片,色情,情色網,情色,av,av女優,成人影城,成人,色情a片,日本av,免費成人影片,成人影片,情色a片,sex,免費a片,a片下載,免費a片下載,成人網站,做愛,自拍

情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,AIO交友愛情館,愛情公寓,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色小說,情色文學,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,色情遊戲,嘟嘟情人色網,一葉情貼圖片區,情色論壇,色情影片,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片區,成人圖片,成人貼圖,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,視訊聊天室,視訊聊天